F

C.H.S.A.A. Solo and Ensemble

 

The 2009 C.H.S.A.A. Solo and Ensemble festival was held on February 28th at Mitchell High School.  The Results from this weekend are as follows:

Result Members (ensembles) Instrument
III Clarinet Duet Nicole Torrez, Autumn Tapia Clarinet
II Saxophone Duet Cindy Gutierrez, Alyssa Pallen Saxophone
II Saxophone Quartet James Brown, Christian Fergins, Matthew Pakenham, Alma Robinson Saxophone
I Christian Fergins Oboe
II Jacob Watson Alto Saxophone
I James Brown Baritone Saxophone
II Leilani Conklin Flute
III Samantha Tennyson Clarinet
I- Brass Quintet I Demetrio Cutaran, Justin Graham, Clayton Taylor, Nicholas Watson, Brannon Yandell Brass Quintet
II Woodwind Quintet I Leilani Conklin, Christian Fergins, Justin Graham, Joseph Hazel, Matthew Pakenham WW Quintet
IV Low Brass Duet Matthuw Carlson, Heather Edwards Trombone/Euphonium
III Trumpet Duet David Atencio, Demetrio Cutaran TTrumpet
II Brannon Yandell Trombone
NR Chris Russello Trumpet
I Demetrio Cutaran Trumpet
II Francis Alferos   Trumpet
II Jacob Anderson Tuba
I Kale Paxton Trumpet
I Percussion Ensemble Eric Graham, Asheley Gregor, Jessica Lazzaro, Tyler Leija, AJ McMichael, Josh Terpak Percussion Ensemble
I Josh Terpak Marimba
IV Judith Mayorga Flute
 
 
 

Rating I - Superior

An outstanding, or consistent, performance, with few technical errors exemplifying a truly musical expression.

Rating II - Excellent

An excellent performance in many respects, but not worthy of the highest rating due to minor defects in performance techniques, interpretation or ineffective use of existing instrumentation. The C.H.S.A.A. lexicon says that performances in this rating frequently, but not consistently meet the highest standards.

Rating III - Good

An average, or “good” in CHSAA parlance, performance showing accomplished and marked promise. The performance lacks one or more essential musical qualities, has musical weakness, and ineffectively uses existing instrumentation.  In truth, most performances generally belong within the parameters of a “III” rating. It could be viewed as the base from which each group is judged.

Rating IV - Fair

A fair performance with many technical errors, poor musical conception, lack of musical interpretation, ineffective use of existing instrumentation, and musically-essential qualities are seldom evident.

Rating V - Poor/Unprepared

An ineffective, or unprepared, performance indicating major deficiencies in tone quality, intonation, balance, blend, musical expression and effective use of existing instrumentation. The fundamentals of good performance need careful attention. This rating is used sparingly, citing specific ways to improve major problems.


 

BACK

 

 

© 2009